Search View Thomas Kuhn

To find a specific word, name, or topic in this article, select the option in your Web browser for finding within the page. In Internet Explorer, this option is under the Edit menu.

The search seeks the exact word or phrase that you type, so if you don’t find your choice, try searching for a keyword in your topic or recheck the spelling of a word or name.

Thomas Kuhn

Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996), American historian and philosopher of science, renowned for being the main contributor to the change of orientation of philosophy and sociology of science in the 1960s. Thomas Samuel Kuhn was born in Cincinnati, Ohio, and received a PhD from Harvard University in theoretical physics in 1949. He switched to history and philosophy of science, which he taught at Harvard, Berkeley, Princeton, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

In 1962, Kuhn published The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, which depicted the development of the basic natural sciences in a way that differed substantially from the then common view. According to Kuhn, the sciences do not uniformly progress by the application of some alleged scientific method. Rather, there are two fundamentally different phases of scientific development in the mature sciences. In the phase of normal science, there is a broad consensus in the scientific community about how to exploit the analogies to what has been achieved earlier, most notably to exemplary problem solutions that Kuhn called paradigms. In the phase of extraordinary science, new theories and research tools are sought as the old ones cease to function fruitfully. If a new theory can be shown to be superior to its competitors, it is accepted, and a scientific revolution takes place. Such revolutionary breakthroughs bring about a change of scientific concepts, problems, solutions, and methods. Although these changes are never total, they make scientific development at these junctures somewhat discontinuous; the older theory and the newer theory are said to be incommensurable with each other. Such incommensurability entails that the comparison of the two theories is more complicated than simply confronting mutually inconsistent predictions.

Kuhn's book triggered a widespread, controversial discussion across many disciplines and extended enormous influence. In response to criticism he continued to correct and refine his theory until his death.